Frustration and anger can be contained for just so long before they boil over. Many people I know are quickly reaching that point, and it's time for some extremely blunt talk.
I am sick and tired of the hypocrisy and eternal campaigning in which Obama engages. White House tours have been shut down during spring break, allegedly because of the miniscule sequestration. There are lots of disappointed children out there who had been planning a trip to D.C. to take the tour. Meanwhile, the Obama daughters gleefully jet from the Bahamas to snow skiing in Idaho on the taxpayers' money, and the president has averaged more than one vacation a month during the first three months of 2013.
It's apparent that when Obama isn't campaigning, he's vacationing. Our economy is virtually stalled, millions of people are either unemployed or have given up looking for a job and the number of people using food stamps has grown at an alarming rate. For the royal Obamas to be prancing about on their lavish vacations while millions of Americans are suffering is downright insulting. They are figuratively spitting in the collective face of the American populace.
To add insult to injury, Barack Obama is THE biggest liar we've ever had in the White House. He has demonstrated a total lack of respect for our laws and the Constitution and his policies are, I believe, deliberately designed to hurt the United States. His word means nothing, as he has revealed himself to be completely untrustworthy.
Perhaps most egregiously, however, is his failure to protect our national security. When an American president fails to lead, the result is mounting chaos world-wide, and Obama has shown extreme weakness in the face of these dangers. It seems that he has not taken the very real threats that Russia, North Korea, Iran and China represent seriously and it's obvious the leaders of these countries have a profound lack of respect for the president.
In short, he has failed to uphold the oath of office he took when inaugurated. He has been derelict in his duty, overstepped the boundaries of his power at home, failed to support our allies and has emboldened our enemies. For all these reasons, he should be impeached and removed from office.
Friday, March 29, 2013
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Insulting
President Obama and the rest of his administration must believe Americans are as dumb as a box of rocks. Director of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano goes on TV to tell us that the lines at the major airports are longer than usual and that it's taking longer to get through customs. Meanwhile, the airports are saying that the lines are not longer and are moving normally. Why do they lie about something that's so easily verifiable? Could it be that Obama and Napolitano think we're too stupid or lazy to know they're lying?
Obama is obviously trying to save money. For instance, he's cancelled all White House tours due to the sequestration. Boy, that's going to save a lot of money - White House tours are conducted by unpaid volunteers! There was no need to shut these down; it's merely a spiteful, punitive move by a small, petulant man who's angry that he hasn't gotten his way. One more thing - the White House is NOT yours, Mr. President; it belongs to the American people.
Obama is not worthy of our respect. I can understand why he and others in his administration think Americans are stupid. After all, they did elect him twice.
Obama is obviously trying to save money. For instance, he's cancelled all White House tours due to the sequestration. Boy, that's going to save a lot of money - White House tours are conducted by unpaid volunteers! There was no need to shut these down; it's merely a spiteful, punitive move by a small, petulant man who's angry that he hasn't gotten his way. One more thing - the White House is NOT yours, Mr. President; it belongs to the American people.
Obama is not worthy of our respect. I can understand why he and others in his administration think Americans are stupid. After all, they did elect him twice.
Friday, March 1, 2013
Contempt and Loathing
Well, the talks today between congressional leaders and the president about the impending sequestration apparently have failed. Is anyone surprised?
President Obama portrays himself as having his hands tied - those evil, rigid Republicans simply won't compromise and won't agree to "new revenue". Meanwhile, Obama repeats over and over, ad nauseam, that he wants a "balanced approach" (please see my blog posting of 2/8/13 for that definition).
May we remind the president that he has already raised our taxes this year, and it's now time for him to do some compromising? Democrats always promise spending cuts sometime in the not well-defined future, but somehow that time never seems to come.
If the president were even halfway honest, he'd tell people that he has no interest in cutting governmental spending and his "balanced approach" means he wants tax hikes on everyone. When he says that Republicans won't agree to "new revenue", what he really means is that Republicans refuse to raise taxes, especially in light of the fact that we've already seen a tax hike this year. Republicans wanted to pass a bill that would give President Obama greater flexibility in deciding where spending cuts would occur when the sequestration kicks in, but Obama immediately announced he would veto such a bill. Why would he do that, when it gives him more power? It's simple: if such a bill were passed, the president would then have to actually make a decision and take some responsibility (gasp!) for something and we can't have that!
The fact is, Obama wants to make the sequestration as painful as possible for as many people as possible in the belief that Americans will blame Republicans for their pain. He is hell bent on decimating Republicans in the hope that Democrats can take control of the House next year. The fact that an American president is willing to inflict unnecessary pain on the American populace for his own political gain is shocking and shameful.
I pray that my fellow Americans will wake up and recognize the chaos and damage that this president is wreaking on our country, all in the name of political power. Obama has inspired some strong feelings in many people. For me, those feelings are contempt and loathing.
President Obama portrays himself as having his hands tied - those evil, rigid Republicans simply won't compromise and won't agree to "new revenue". Meanwhile, Obama repeats over and over, ad nauseam, that he wants a "balanced approach" (please see my blog posting of 2/8/13 for that definition).
May we remind the president that he has already raised our taxes this year, and it's now time for him to do some compromising? Democrats always promise spending cuts sometime in the not well-defined future, but somehow that time never seems to come.
If the president were even halfway honest, he'd tell people that he has no interest in cutting governmental spending and his "balanced approach" means he wants tax hikes on everyone. When he says that Republicans won't agree to "new revenue", what he really means is that Republicans refuse to raise taxes, especially in light of the fact that we've already seen a tax hike this year. Republicans wanted to pass a bill that would give President Obama greater flexibility in deciding where spending cuts would occur when the sequestration kicks in, but Obama immediately announced he would veto such a bill. Why would he do that, when it gives him more power? It's simple: if such a bill were passed, the president would then have to actually make a decision and take some responsibility (gasp!) for something and we can't have that!
The fact is, Obama wants to make the sequestration as painful as possible for as many people as possible in the belief that Americans will blame Republicans for their pain. He is hell bent on decimating Republicans in the hope that Democrats can take control of the House next year. The fact that an American president is willing to inflict unnecessary pain on the American populace for his own political gain is shocking and shameful.
I pray that my fellow Americans will wake up and recognize the chaos and damage that this president is wreaking on our country, all in the name of political power. Obama has inspired some strong feelings in many people. For me, those feelings are contempt and loathing.
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Are You Stupid?
What's the difference between being ignorant and being stupid? Merriam-Webster defines "ignorant" as unaware, uninformed. Their definition of "stupid" is "slow of mind".
The poll numbers are puzzling: a majority of people in this country (60+%) say that we're on the wrong track, yet President Obama's job approval rating remains a little above 50%. In my lifetime, presidents have gotten credit for a good economy and blame for a poor economy, regardless of whether they deserved it or not. Yet, people don't seem to realize that Obama's policies are largely responsible for our being on the wrong track.
Are people failing to make the connection due to ignorance or stupidity? It seems that a large segment of the American populace believes everything the president says, even when there's clear evidence that he's lying. He has backtracked on his previous statements time and time again, yet many people fail to note the inconsistency. One of the president's favorite tactics is to terrify people with his dire warnings of governmental and societal Armageddon if budget cuts are made, no matter how paltry they may be. It's clear that Obama is willing to sacrifice the well-being of the country and play with peoples' lives to reach his political goal of destroying Republicans.
Take heart - there is a way to easily raise your IQ at least 10 points: quit believing everything the president tells you. In fact, take everything he says with a big grain of salt. Actions speak louder than words, so just watch what he does.
The definitions of "ignorant" and "stupid" as stated above imply that ignorance can be fixed, but stupidity is a permanent state. Gathering good, solid information and being open-minded enough to explore it is a remedy for ignorance. It's one thing to be ignorant, but quite another to voluntarily remain ignorant. That would be, well, stupid.
The poll numbers are puzzling: a majority of people in this country (60+%) say that we're on the wrong track, yet President Obama's job approval rating remains a little above 50%. In my lifetime, presidents have gotten credit for a good economy and blame for a poor economy, regardless of whether they deserved it or not. Yet, people don't seem to realize that Obama's policies are largely responsible for our being on the wrong track.
Are people failing to make the connection due to ignorance or stupidity? It seems that a large segment of the American populace believes everything the president says, even when there's clear evidence that he's lying. He has backtracked on his previous statements time and time again, yet many people fail to note the inconsistency. One of the president's favorite tactics is to terrify people with his dire warnings of governmental and societal Armageddon if budget cuts are made, no matter how paltry they may be. It's clear that Obama is willing to sacrifice the well-being of the country and play with peoples' lives to reach his political goal of destroying Republicans.
Take heart - there is a way to easily raise your IQ at least 10 points: quit believing everything the president tells you. In fact, take everything he says with a big grain of salt. Actions speak louder than words, so just watch what he does.
The definitions of "ignorant" and "stupid" as stated above imply that ignorance can be fixed, but stupidity is a permanent state. Gathering good, solid information and being open-minded enough to explore it is a remedy for ignorance. It's one thing to be ignorant, but quite another to voluntarily remain ignorant. That would be, well, stupid.
Monday, February 25, 2013
Day of Resistance
Last Saturday, there were approximately 150 Day of Resistance rallies across 39 states. Knowing that the mainstream media won't publicize events that don't fit their agenda, I just wanted to pass these pictures along to you. Hope you enjoy them!
Pictures from Day of Resistance rallies
Pictures from Day of Resistance rallies
Friday, February 8, 2013
The Obama Dictionary
President Obama promised that he would have the most transparent administration ever. Well, that hasn't exactly happened has it? Part of the problem is Obama's penchant for using euphemisms instead of plain talk. To help everyone understand what the president is really saying, please see the "dictionary" below.
- Balanced approach: A combination of miniscule, meaningless spending "cuts", coupled with large tax hikes.
- Invest, as in we need to invest in education, infrastructure, research, renewable energy, etc.: Spend more and more of the taxpayers' money, often throwing good money after bad and usually getting nothing in return for our "investment".
- Green energy: A black hole into which billions of taxpayers' dollars are "invested" (see above), with nothing to show in return. It doesn't make any difference that it doesn't produce results; we're compelled to keep pouring those tax dollars into it.
- Sequester: A tool suggested by the White House to bludgeon Republicans into giving the president what he wants, i.e., tax hikes coupled with no spending cuts. This tool may, however, prove to be useless for this purpose, depending on whether or not the Republicans find a spine.
- Benghazi: A city in Libya, where we once had a consulate, and where our ambassador and three others were killed last September. This word doesn't appear to be part of Obama's vocabulary.
- Tax reform: Elimination of deductions, coupled with tax hikes on the "wealthy". An example of real tax reform would be the flat tax, in which everyone pays the same rate, coupled with closure of loopholes enjoyed only by those who have the wherewithal to hire lawyers and accountants to find said loopholes.
- I: President Obama's favorite word, used liberally in most of his public appearances. It refers to his favorite person, himself.
Hopefully, this will clarify some of the statements emanating from the Obama administration. In closing, there are some words of wisdom from Andrew Carnegie I'd like to share: "As I grow older, I pay less attention to what men say. I just watch what they do."
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Eerie
While watching a documentary on the Military History Channel last weekend, a creeping chill took hold of me. The show, entitled "Inside the Mind of Hitler", brought to mind some disturbing analogies with current events. No, I'm not suggesting that Obama is another Hitler. What was chillingly disturbing was the similarity between how the German people idolized and blindly followed Hitler and the way many of Barack Obama's supporters behave toward him. The Germans considered Hitler to be their "savior".
The "mainstream media", by and large, fail to report the president's gaffes and his less than sterling comments and actions. They print only what they want people to know. They provide cover for him and the result is that many people have a false picture of who Barack Obama really is and where he wants to lead the country. They have formed a rosy, positive picture of Obama in their minds which cannot be altered by facts and reality.
As with Hitler, a certain segment of our society is attempting to deify President Obama. Newsweek called the recent inauguration "the second coming", a term with distinctly religious overtones. Jamie Foxx referred to Obama as "our lord and savior" and people mindlessly cheered. This is deeply offensive to those of us who hold religious beliefs and I suspect the real Lord and Savior can't be too happy about it either.
Human beings are all flawed to one degree or another, some more deeply than others. Following any human leader unquestioningly is inherently dangerous, especially if that leader has goals and motives that are less than honorable. It may well be impossible to reach those people who refuse to see how deeply flawed Barack Obama actually is. Their unquestioning, mindless devotion is frightening, and reminiscent of the old saying "there are none so blind as he who will not see."
The "mainstream media", by and large, fail to report the president's gaffes and his less than sterling comments and actions. They print only what they want people to know. They provide cover for him and the result is that many people have a false picture of who Barack Obama really is and where he wants to lead the country. They have formed a rosy, positive picture of Obama in their minds which cannot be altered by facts and reality.
As with Hitler, a certain segment of our society is attempting to deify President Obama. Newsweek called the recent inauguration "the second coming", a term with distinctly religious overtones. Jamie Foxx referred to Obama as "our lord and savior" and people mindlessly cheered. This is deeply offensive to those of us who hold religious beliefs and I suspect the real Lord and Savior can't be too happy about it either.
Human beings are all flawed to one degree or another, some more deeply than others. Following any human leader unquestioningly is inherently dangerous, especially if that leader has goals and motives that are less than honorable. It may well be impossible to reach those people who refuse to see how deeply flawed Barack Obama actually is. Their unquestioning, mindless devotion is frightening, and reminiscent of the old saying "there are none so blind as he who will not see."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
