Quite frankly, her appeal has always been a mystery to me. The conventional wisdom among liberals is that she is one of the smartest women in the country and has a sterling resume. But let's look at this objectively; what, exactly, are her accomplishments?
Let's go back to the 1970s, when Hillary worked on the Watergate investigation. Her boss, Jerry Zeifman, a life-long Democrat, fired her, saying she was a "liar" who had engaged in "unethical" behavior. If Hillary was not trustworthy then, why should anyone believe she can be trusted now?
Hillary served as a Senator from New York for eight years, during which time she had no noteworthy accomplishments. There is no major legislation which bears her name and she missed 9.5% of roll call votes, while the median is 2% among lifetime Senators serving in 2009.
Her next position, Secretary of State, is similarly lacking in significant achievements. She traveled a lot, but what did she accomplish? If someone can tell me, please do so.
I see the same mythologizing going on with Clinton as happened with Barack Obama. These two are supposedly among the best and brightest in the country, but what they really share are a lack of character and a dearth of accomplishments.
Post a Comment