There is duplicity evident in many of the actions of the Obama administration. On the one hand, they argue that access to health care is a "right" and on this basis, they push the idea of government-provided health care for one and all.
On the other hand, Obama appoints men to head Medicare/Medicaid and the Social Security Advisory Board who clearly and openly favor health care rationing. If you believe that every person has a "right" to health care, how do you then decide that one person has more of a right to it than another? Are some people more equal than others? How does one measure the value of a human life?
It's obvious to any clear-thinking person that if the government provides your health care, rationing will be a necessity. Aside from the question of the constitutionality of portions of Obamacare, do you really want a governmental bureaucrat to decide if you are to receive or be denied necessary medical care?
Post a Comment